Search for: "Supreme Court U.S.A." Results 381 - 400 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm by Bryan
Although the words "other lawful purposes" may appear expansive, the Arkansas Supreme Court has stated that it has not given a "broad and liberal construction to this section," [City of Little Rock v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:59 am by Devlin Hartline
Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146, 1162 (9th Cir. 2007) (“The Supreme Court has indicated that in the electronic context, copies may be distributed electronically. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
In each instance, the dispute went to court, and each national church prevailed at the trial court level. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Bona Law PC
Yet five years after the North Carolina dental board lost at the Supreme Court, new disruptive competitors are still battling it out against dental boards across the country. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am by Russell Knight
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. 199 Ill. 2d 325, 335 (2002). [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am by The Legal Blog
Justice TS ThakurThe Supreme Court in Ruchi Majoo v Sanjeev Majoo had the occasion to the deal with the provisions of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 regarding jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of foreign orders/judgments. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:35 am
  In rejecting that position, the Supreme Court of Canada found that, under the circumstances, the Ontario court did have jurisdiction to hear the case. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:15 am by Steve Hall
For US inmates on death row, the sentence is just the beginning of a long countdown to execution.The lengthy wait and harsh conditions that US death row prisoners face has sparked debate over whether they are being punished twice, with long-term imprisonment and execution -- and even US Supreme Court justices have weighed in.On average, 13 years elapses between the time a death sentence is handed down and carried out.During that time, inmates are kept under close guard,… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:36 am by Kiera Flynn
§ 2254 and Supreme Court precedent by overriding state court determinations of law and fact and awarding habeas relief based on a constitutional rule that this Court has never recognized and that the Seventh Circuit derived entirely from its own precedent. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm
Dennis of New York was a former attorney who kept up with the legal news, read the Supreme Court's opinion, and decided that it would be a good idea for the Episcopal Church (USA) to follow Justice Blackmun's advice. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As explained below, we hold that they can. (...)This doctrine is deeply rooted in Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Here, the court analyzed the association’s challenge to the validity of the DOL rule under the two-step analytical framework laid out in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]