Search for: "Test v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 15,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
In the latter case, the WCAB applied the two-prong test in Parks v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
The Court then stated a 5 part test that I will not reiterate here, though it is well laid out in the opinion. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 8:22 pm
–––– [139 S.Ct. 2525] (Mitchell), the United States Supreme Court held when a “driver is unconscious and therefore cannot be given a breath test … the exigent-circumstances rule almost always permits a blood test without a warrant. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Although the actual decision was unanimous, four justices argued that the majority’s new test is too narrow and will negatively affect water quality and flood control in the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Test for Proper Venue RevisedIn the case of Hangey v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:47 pm
Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:40 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:33 am
" United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm
United States 23-310Issue: Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 11:28 am
Contents include:Special Issue: The Evidentiary System of the European Court of Human Rights in Critical Perspective Marie-Bénédicte Dembour, The Evidentiary System of the European Court of Human Rights in Critical Perspective Marie-Bénédicte Dembour, Beyond Reasonable Doubt at its Worst – But Also at its Potential Best: Dissecting Ireland v the United Kingdom’s No-Torture Finding Kristin Henrard, The European Court of Human Rights and… [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:32 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK December 21, 2024 Genesis Technology v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
United States, demanding warrants to overcome the reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
