Search for: "U.S. v. Cruz"
Results 381 - 400
of 506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2021, 5:19 pm
Fla.) in Dershowitz v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
Starting from the hearing held on 15 July in the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 5:54 am
Ted Cruz (R-TX), Ohio Gov. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
The U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:45 pm
Gilleo, 512 U.S. 43 (1994). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 3:31 pm
Senator Ted Cruz, U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964); Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:13 pm
Crawford can be explained by the principle of "the dog who didn't bark," said Morgan Lewis' Cruz. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
” For The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports that “Moody unsuccessfully appealed to the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
However, according to Pifer, who later served as U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, while the parties allegedly did not discuss details of the U.S. response under this commitment, in his opinion, the response should involve military assistance. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
League of Women Voters, 468 U.S. 364 (1984). 80 Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Ted Cruz (R-TX), Sen. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 3:27 am
Pierre in turn relied on New York v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm
Gilleo, 512 U.S. 43 (1994). [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
Circuit’s ruling in Doe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
In Train v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:00 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 277 (2011), and Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
California (U.S. 2003) the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:24 am
Several people (including Senator Cruz, Eugene Kontorovich, Mike Pompeo and David Rivkin, and a majority of the members of the House of Representatives) have argued that the Iran Review Act bars the President from lifting U.S. sanctions against Iran. [read post]
