Search for: "U.S. v. Marcus"
Results 381 - 400
of 427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 11:48 pm
Never once during the Nokia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:04 pm
In that post, I encouraged you to keep an eye on Young v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
A circuit executive for the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:15 am
NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., May 10, 2016, Marcus, S.). [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 6:45 am
Waffle House, Inc., August 7, 2017, Marcus, S.). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
– Marcus v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974). [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes will join Brookings Visiting Fellow and journalist Ruth Marcus to discuss her new book, “Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 8:17 am
See Air Transport Ass’n of America, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 2:19 pm
” U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
The only decision of note was Kanter v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
RE Broker 2 John Brancato U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
A notable cohort of progressive or otherwise anti-Trump commentators are also scoffing at the indictment, including David Frum, Rick Hasen, Ruth Marcus, and Ian Millhiser. [read post]
Qualcomm's Mannheim Steamroller is stuttering: patents too young to defeat Apple in tech-savvy court
3 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
The first Qualcomm v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
The McNulty Memorandum, released in 2006, stated that prosecutors could only request privilege waivers if there was a “legitimate need” for the privileged information, and that if a legitimate need existed after going through a multi-factor analysis, prosecutors should seek the least intrusive waiver necessary to complete a thorough investigation.[4] The Filip Memorandum, not a memorandum per se, made revisions in 2008 to the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm
., Trustees v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
