Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Smith" Results 381 - 400 of 771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., No. 15-559 (Commil re-hash – if actions were “not objectively unreasonable&rdqu [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 3:56 am by Dennis Crouch
 Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Review 29. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Dame Janet Smith’s report into culture and practices at the BBC during the time that Jimmy Saville worked there was published this week. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Cybereagle’s Graham Smith gives his reaction to the report here. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm by Steve Gottlieb
But on the floor a motion was made to make the point indisputable: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
The following is a short review of the amicus briefs that have been filed in the case.[3] United States Government When the United States government files and amicus brief, that brief is usually seen as the most important amicus brief in the case. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:35 am by Nicholas Gebelt
 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy   The Bankruptcy Code (title 11 of the United States Code) is divided up into chapters. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:27 am by Zack Bluestone
Abe’s tour to the USS Ronald Reagan and the participation of Vice Admiral Tyson of America’s Third Fleet (see above), the fleet review drove home the message that Japan’s naval resurgence will be accompanied by wider naval engagement by the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
  In Bateman v Mnemonics (1996), the court there stated that because fair use is a statutory doctrine, fair use is not an infringement. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Food-related Illness and Death in the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
So what is the law of female toplessness in the United States? [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]