Search for: "UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT" Results 381 - 400 of 729
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 10:08 am by Jordan Pascale, P.L.
The homeowner wrote three letters to the judge informing him that the homeowner was serving in the United States Army. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
It does not. (...)The Commerce Clause “dictates that no State may force an out-of-state merchant to seek regulatory approval in one State before undertaking a transaction in another. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Background: The Breach of Target’s Security Target is based in Minneapolis and has almost 1,800 stores in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am by Ron Coleman
 The foreign editions are uniformly manufactured outside the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm by Sheppard Mullin
In reversing the Southern District, the Second Circuit held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in American Express Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:06 pm by Larry Tolchinsky
Supreme Court Opinion One week ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in American Express v. [read post]