Search for: "US v. Daniel David" Results 381 - 400 of 991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 10:48 am by vera
EFF was represented at the Supreme Court of Canada and the British Columbia Court of Appeal by David Wotherspoon of MacPherson Leslie & Tyerman and Daniel Byma of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, Daniel Henninger weighs in on Matal v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, David Gans weighs in on Monday’s decision in Ziglar v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, David Levine and Thomas Kearns discuss the court’s decision in Midland Funding, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
  Comments and suggestions (especially for compiling a useful student friendly reading list) gratefully received as this remains very much a work in progress. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
That is, in fact, how “we” have been acculturated to “see” and “abstract” the reality around “us” in the social space in which we interact. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The claimants include actor David Tennant and ex Formula One driver Eddie Irvine. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Jordan Brunner
Andrew Kent reviewed David Armitage’s book Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage comes from Adam Liptak in The New York Times, David Savage in the Los Angeles Times, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, and Daniel Fisher at Forbes, who notes that the decision “further strengthens the once-controversial Supreme Court doctrine extending First Amendment protection to corporate, as opposed to individual speech. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Facebook and Instagram have banned developers from using their data for surveillance with a new privacy policy that civil rights activists have long sought to curb spying by law enforcement. [read post]