Search for: "US v. David Phillips"
Results 381 - 400
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog, Douglas Berman considers Monday’s decision in Dean v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm
Martinez, Alex Verdugo, Xander Bogaerts, Hunter Renfroe, Christian Vázquez, Kike Hernandez, Bobby Dalbec, Christian Arroyo). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:55 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued what I believe will end up being one the most significant employment decisions of the last decade—Staub v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:41 pm
The case was Flood v Times Newspaper and, thankfully, the judges reinforced the responsible journalism defence in defamation. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:02 am
Phillips, Attorney General; David L. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm
Phillips of the Washington office of Sidley Austin and Seth P. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Vitek Supply Corp., 144 F.3d 476, 480, 485–86 (7th Cir. 1998) (affirming denial of defendant’s Rule 702 challenge based in part upon error rates; the purpose of the inquiry into rate of error is to determine whether tests are “accurate and reliable”; here the government’s expert witnesses used adequate controls and replication to ensure an acceptably low rate of error) Phillips v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
On the evidentiary dispute, concerning the use of statistical evidence, the government — like Tyson — relied upon the Court’s 1946 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
There are a number of resolved cases to report, including: Mr Phillip Scofield v Best, Clause 1, 30/03/2012; Mr Craig Whittaker MP v Halifax Evening Courier, Clause 1, 29/03/2012; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 28/03/2012; A man v Daily Mail, clause 1, 3, 5, 28/03/2012; Mr Nathan Roberts v Daily Mail, clause 1, 2, 28/03/2012; Mr Andrew Morgan v The Sun, clause 1, 28/03/2012; Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, clause 12,… [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:01 am
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:35 am
Olson, Appellate Counsel; David E. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
Contact us: ERIC N. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Donabedian, Devon Van Noble, Erik Phillips-Nania,Emily Parish and Jennifer L. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
C.I.R., 136 T.C. 341 (2011); Virginia Route 231, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
Do join us! [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
The most frequent oral advocates include David Frederick with nine arguments, Tom Goldstein and Paul Clement with eight, and Neal Katyal, Malcolm Stewart, and Carter Phillips with four each. [read post]
