Search for: "US v. Francisco" Results 381 - 400 of 3,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 2:44 am by Lyle Denniston
The most recent case in point: the Justices on Monday declined to review a San Francisco gun law that was remarkably similar to one they struck down in a landmark ruling in 2008 [District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
New Jersey Eminent Domain Blog posts "Eminent Domain, Fifth Amendment Property Rights, and Government Retaliation" about last Term's US Supreme Court decision in Wilkie v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
New Jersey Eminent Domain Blog posts "Eminent Domain, Fifth Amendment Property Rights, and Government Retaliation" about last Term's US Supreme Court decision in Wilkie v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:54 pm
The US Supreme Court has denied a petition to review a Seventh Circuit opinion which dismissed a property owner's regulatory takings challenge on ripeness grounds under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:09 pm
  Getting mocked -- even if alongside a compliment -- is another.That's what happens to several San Francisco lawyers today.It's a case about reinsurance. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Some related links: the resolution; the 1996 Board of County Commissioners v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:14 am by Kenneth Hall
” Although finding that this standard had been met, Bolanos determined that the putative damages in this matter violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as observed by the US Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:53 pm by Cal Law
District Attorney Harris has called on John Keker, a top criminal defense attorney, chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:24 pm by Jason Kilborn
On November 6, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case only a lawyer--and probably only a commercial or bankruptcy lawyer--could love, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:42 pm by jamie
Luckily, a court in San Francisco has called foul, questioning LinkedIn’s use of the CFAA to block access to public data. [read post]