Search for: "US v. Green" Results 381 - 400 of 6,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 6:47 am by Morris Turek
  According to the Green Giant website, the name was first used with the introduction of an unusually large pea, but as we all know, use of the GREEN GIANT mark has expanded to include all kinds of vegetables and vegetable blends over the years. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:19 pm
Not when one Nevada prisoner killed another by using the rolling pin from a typewriter, and another attempted to stab a guard with a shank from a different typewriter. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:44 am by Eleonora Rosati
Under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 8:02 am by Kedar
US (January 13, 2009) Thoughts on Pleseant Grove v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:30 am by J
Sheresby v Greenhurst Park Management Co Ltd, noted by us here). [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” ]**In passing, the term -- re-originated --, used back in 1843, evokes the term used by Masnick in the 21st century, --re-imagined--. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
In State v Green, the Appellate Division held that the the Stalker Lidar speed measurement device has not yet shown to be scientifically reliable. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:34 pm by Fong & Aquino
After the historic 2013 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:09 am by Steve Brachmann
Earlier today, the US Supreme Court issued it's highly anticipated 7 to 2 decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Nathaniel Miller
Using some other choice words, Green said about the comeback kids: “the Bears are who we thought they were! [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm by qbaron
The four finalists, in two-person teams, argued the takings clause case, Tyler v. [read post]