Search for: "US v. Hernandez"
Results 381 - 400
of 958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
Stretching even further for “human evidence,” the PSC submitted documentary evidence of adverse event reports, as though they could support a causal conclusion.[2] There are about four million live births each year, with an expected rate of serious cardiac malformations of about one per cent.[3] The prevalence of SSRI anti-depressant use is at least two per cent, which means that we would expect 800 cardiac birth defects each year to occur in children of… [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Hernández v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am
" And in Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:12 am
How to Use: In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:32 am
See generally Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 8:13 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Raytheon v Hernandez 540 US 44 (2003), 540 U.S. 44 (2003), the appellate court concluded the neutral policy constituted a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason to refuse to hire the nurses. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 11:28 am
And speaking of wins . . . . let’s talk about Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
Her claims under the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) and Title VII were dismissed without prejudice (Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:05 pm
The plaintiff also sought an injunction prohibiting defendants from, e.g., using the plaintiff’s confidential information and using that information to contact the plaintiff’s customers. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:27 am
The case sent to the Justice Department for reaction, Hernandez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm
Id. at *4; see also fn. 4 (distinguishing Gomez-Hernandez). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 7:12 am
However, I knew from experience in the Gil v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
Hernandez-Rubio v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
Ct. 2466 (2013), can provide the basis for using this type of preemption in certain cases involving medical devices cleared under the FDCA’s §510(k) “substantial equivalence” process. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:34 pm
In City of Socorro v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 6:43 am
Felipe Hernandez, No. 108,684 (Sedgwick)K.S.A. 21-2512 appealJanine CoxImproper summary denial of DNA testState v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Hernandez, 778 F. [read post]
