Search for: "US v. James Marshall" Results 381 - 400 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
”[v] The American Revolution and US Constitution are less a founding of this history of civic identity than a continuation of it, and even the Civil War itself is only a temporary cessation of this history’s constancy. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:35 am by Tara Hofbauer
The Supreme Court reached a decision today in Riley v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
The modern version of the committee confirmation process, with senators pressing nominees on their judicial views, started in 1955 when southern Dixiecrats wanted to grill John Marshall Harlan about his view of the court’s decision the previous year striking down school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
The Marshall Project sought to determine which books are banned in the various state prison systems. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
  Kagan advised Justice Marshall to vote to deny cert. in DeShaney v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
In his opinion for the court, Justice Stephen Breyer started with common ground for both sides: the Court’s 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
” Beyond the individual clauses and their interpretation—but way, way short of some ethereal Dworkinian principle—there’s the constitutional structure and its logic (or “genius,” as John Marshall used to say). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Drug Policy Nora Demleitner, Washington and Lee University School of Law, Drug Courts: Not a Public Health Solution Katherine Drabiak, University of South Florida College of Public Health, Questioning Medication Assisted Treatment James Hodge, Arizona State University College of Law, Supervised Injection Facilities: Legal and Policy Reforms Daniel Orenstein, University of California San Francisco, Grassroots of Grass: Cannabis Legalization Ballot Initiative Campaign Contributions and… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Judges believe that they have argued persuasively for a result, not by correctly marshaling statistical and scientific concepts, but by relying upon precedents erroneously arrived at by other judges in earlier cases. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
While Congress exercises considerable control over the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, since the landmark decision in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
"It is unseemly -- to say the least -- that Kentucky may well kill [its condemned prisoners] using a drug that it would not permit to be used on their pets," Stevens said.The decision in Baze v. [read post]