Search for: "United States v. Barnett" Results 381 - 400 of 585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2012, 4:26 am by Lawrence Solum
Instead, this article focuses on whether the Constitution of the United States protects economic liberty. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Randy Barnett  and Keith Whittington  have played prominent roles in the development of the “New Originalism. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Paul Horwitz
United States an anti-commandeering principle with respect to some otherwise valid Commerce Clause laws that infringe on particular aspects of state sovereignty relating to the political process and structure in those states, so, by virtue of the language referring to the people in the Tenth Amendment, it also prohibits mandates that "commandeer the people. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am by Randy Barnett
United States (1997) in an opinion by Justice Scalia) and the state judiciary (in Alden v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the United States Supreme Court, the Michigan Supreme Court, this Court, and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
 And Chief Justice Warren Burger once said of him that he could not identify “any judicial colleague more highly qualified to have come to the Supreme Court of the United States than Henry Friendly. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm by Andrew Koppelman
United States: Elliott Welsh’s Two Religious TestsAndrew KoppelmanChapter 11Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
”  The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]