Search for: "United States v. Cover" Results 381 - 400 of 14,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Douthat might mean to take on the very idea of the supremacy of the United States Constitution or the institution of judicial review, but if so, he needs to say a lot more. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm by Ryan E. Long
For example, in a recent decision from United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the court found that wholly created AI works cannot be copyrighted. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 8:44 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  Yet, as discussed in a recently published short article in The Hill, there is no question that access to public defense in the United States remains elusive and unequal. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 6:56 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Insurance lawyers who handle hail damage claims need to be aware of this 2023 opinion from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
First, the court found that the state consumer protection law claims couldn’t cover the US because it wasn’t enough to allege that “substantially similar statutes” exist in all other states is insufficient, and they only cited California and Missouri consumer protection law in the complaint. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Every republication of the album cover restarts the clock. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
”  If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Once United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) determines that two regulatory criteria have been met, it conducts a second layer of review – the “final merits determination” pursuant to Kazarian v. [read post]