Search for: "United States v. Cox" Results 381 - 400 of 507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
Netflix streams Rick and Morty and Star Trek: Discovery in the United Kingdom but not in the United States because its licensing contract requires such geographical differentiation to confirm with underlying copyright law.[11] For similar reasons, Amazon requires publishers of e-books to specify the countries where they own publishing rights, and it allows sales only to those countries.[12] Google likewise removes certain pages from its search results when ordered to do so… [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
Looking inward, Citibank, AIG, and Bank of America could be thought of as instrumentalities of the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Steve Vladeck
United States, holding–by a 3-2 majority–that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain CCR’s arguments on the merits. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm by Michael Zischke
  Mitigated negative declaration on conversion of apartments to hotel upheld against claim of impact based on loss of rent-stabilized units; baseline did not include any such units. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 3:11 am
Ed. 1031 (1942); see also Cox v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The case was originally charged by UM Law Alumni and Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The case was originally charged by UM Law Alumni and Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This was an appeal from the United States District Court for theMiddle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK,Judge Timothy J. [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, Justice Gorsuch  issued a 33 page manifesto, cast as a dissenting opinion, dismissing Scalia’s deferential perspective as a “blank check” to federal bureaucrats. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm by WSLL
Cox, Cox, Horning & McGrath, LLC, Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Defendants): Catherine M. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
With that said, the book provides insights relevant to analyzing the Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]