Search for: "United States v. Diamond"
Results 381 - 400
of 442
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 37, 42 (1979). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
INS: speech the state can’t regulate—how far are we from having no distinction b/t commercial and noncommercial speech? [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm
United States The Minnesota Court of Appeals has held that the state’s criminal libel law which allows for punishment of up to one year imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $3,000 for libellous statements is unconstitutionally overboard. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
The United States has submitted a draft resolution to the U.N. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
United States A libel claim brought by a Philadelphia firefighter against the New York Daily News has been dismissed. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
Here the courts in England and Wales were struggling to ascertain the intended meaning of clauses of a licence intended to take effect in the United States, where the gap between a brand's profile-raising strategy for football (a.k.a. soccer) apparel and the manner of its execution could be measured in light years. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:05 am
United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Due to shipping considerations, only United States addresses, please. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
Hilen v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
His dissent in Diamond v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
After the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
