Search for: "United States v. Hole" Results 381 - 400 of 810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2014, 8:32 am by Jeremy Saland
Prior to establishing the law practice, the partners at Crotty Saland PC served collectively in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and the United States Attorney’s Office. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm by Elina Saxena
Republican Presidential-candidate Donald Trump called for the United States to ban all Muslims from entering the country. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Shortly after taking office, President Trump issued an Executive Order —entitled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States”—that directs relevant cabinet officers to deprive sanctuary jurisdictions of federal funding. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:09 pm
"While we do not think that the trial court was equating itself with the United States Supreme Court," Yegan wrote, "the effect of its ruling can only be equated with overruling Marchman. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by admin
 His story is told through a lawsuit to which he was party, the landmark United States Supreme Court decision Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am by SHG
 Shortly after its passage, the Supreme Court held that the Amendment “is not a mere prohibition of State laws establishing or upholding slavery, but an absolute declaration that slavery or involuntary servitude shall not exist in any part of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
If the skilled person were in the United States, he would seek the assistance of a FAA DER who would be responsible for ensuring compliance with the relevant FAA regulations and guidelines. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by News Desk
It must also pay R$ 1.5 million ($320,000) to the State Fund for Consumer Protection and Defense. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
  Alex likely would have agreed that I would have been mining a dry hole, as the Supreme Court later confirmed in Milliken v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
§ 1514A.The plaintiffs, joined by the intervening plaintiff United States Secretary of Labor, sought an injunction enforcing a preliminary order of the Secretary which required CTI to reinstate the plaintiffs to their previous positions. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States, the United States Supreme Court is currently considering whether lengthening a completed routine traffic stop for a brief narcotics dog sniff violates the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]