Search for: "United States v. March"
Results 381 - 400
of 10,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 12:01 am
Leser v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 10:08 pm
Search incident could extend to defendant's shoes under United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:43 am
After the Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:54 am
United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) cases, Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:15 pm
Sticking closely to the reasoning of its March opinion, the CAFC reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that claims of U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:53 am
The article addresses a recent case by the Supreme Court of the United States, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 5:56 am
The Women’s History Month March Madness contest enters the Quarterfinals this morning, with a clash of the titans: Michelle Obama v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:17 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:45 am
In Mayo v, Prometheus (No. 10-1150, March 20, 2012), the Court held that U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Verdugo-Urquidez (1989), in which the Court held that 4th Amendment was not violated by the overseas warrantless search of property belonging to Mexican nationals with no ties to the United States; United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
