Search for: "United States v. Michael Cooper"
Results 381 - 400
of 660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Theory and Engagement: State and Cooperative in the Global Context 607V. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Earle, 38 U.S. 519 (1839) and Paul v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:30 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
Department of Agriculture (docket 12-123), by Michael W. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
In my post about Prenda Law's defamation lawsuits, I mentioned that Prenda is facing an inquiry by United States District Judge Otis Wright in Los Angeles. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
Michael Kellogg argued for American Express. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 6:56 pm
The Court found that “in certain respects, the EEOC has been negligent in its discovery obligations, dilatory in cooperating with defense counsel, and somewhat cavalier in its responsibility to the United States District Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 2:00 pm
, United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
The degendering of marriage has not been attacked as a violation of the United States constitution because we understand that the marriages the states sanction today are marriage and give what is required by the Constitution (whatever that is, about which the courts have not said much). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:28 am
Thank you for your cooperation. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:33 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm
" Petitioners -- the State of Texas; the Chamber of Commerce of the United States; and representatives of nationwide manufacturing, chemical and petroleum industries -- petition for review of the EPA's action under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am
Cooper, and Martinez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
