Search for: "United States v. Power Engineering Co." Results 381 - 400 of 482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Justice Department announced that Plains All American Pipeline and several of its operating subsidiaries have agreed to spend approximately $41 million to upgrade 10,420 miles of crude oil pipeline operated in the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
A.D. 2007), rev’d, 948 A.2d 587 (N.J. 2008); International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:36 am by Dennis Crouch
And, these are the patents and applications that are most likely to be affected by the decision in Bilski v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:57 pm
In clause 5 of that agreement, the watchmaker undertook not to object to the engineers' use or registration in the United Kingdom of certain "excluded goods". [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:57 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Xingyue Group Co., Ltd. of China, Shanghai Xingyue Power Machinery Co. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
Florida Power & Light Co., 511 U.S. 222 (1994). [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
Navistar had asked the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to void those polices because they had been adopted by the EPA without the public process required by law, but instead following input only from the SCR engine makers. [read post]