Search for: "United States v. Speaks"
Results 381 - 400
of 8,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
The Chief only speaks out when it serves his interests Again, whenever the Chief Justice speaks of the Court's "legitimacy," he is actually speaking about himself--the man cannot separate himself from the Court. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:14 am
The courts find that plaintiff in this case did not speak on matters of public concern when she filed two prior lawsuits against her public employer.The case is Flynn v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands.Throughout the opinion, Gorsuch expressed respect and sympathy for anti-discrimination laws but also said that compelled speech concerns limited how such laws can be enforced. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
In so doing, Davis ignores the fact that every federal judge takes the same solemn oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent [upon] them” under the Constitution and the laws of the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 4:40 am
Giving full effect to the right to free speech in a pluralistic democratic society requires acknowledging and addressing the ways in which those who are members of “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
For example, BPJ v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
“The First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote on behalf of the six-member majority. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
The Constitution’s Appointments Clause makes clear that the President nominates “officers of the United States,” but this nomination is subject to the Advice and Consent of the Senate. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:00 pm
I've given talks at dozens of universities and other institutions across the United States, and in twenty other countries. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:15 am
On June 30, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to weigh in on whether gender dysphoria can qualify as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), allowing to stand the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Williams v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
The Facts Youarash Soormi (applicant) was born in Iran and emigrated to the United States from Iran in 2008. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has said facial recognition could create “mass surveillance of our public spaces, destroying any concept of privacy. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:22 pm
In US v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
II,§ 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
