Search for: "United States v. Towns" Results 381 - 400 of 2,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a Pennsylvania man can be held criminally liable for his statements on Facebook. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:14 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In Hernandez v Pena, --- F.3d ---, 2016 WL 1719955 (5th Cir.,2016) six-year-old D.A.P.G. was abducted from his home in Honduras and brought illegally into the United States by his mother Reina Leticia Garcia Peña. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It is therefore a "requirement that pseudonymity be limited to the 'unusual case.'" United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 10:05 am by Patricia Salkin
 Defendants, Town of Mesilla and its Board of Trustees, denied the application for the special use permit which led to this action in the United States District Court, District of New Mexico. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Patricia Salkin
Boehm v Town of Sullivan’s Island Board of Zoning Appeals, 2018 WL 1513747 (SC App 3/28/2018) [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:16 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
This may be old news to most of you at this point, but because it bears posting on this blog (and because I was out of town last week), here is the rundown on the Sixth Circuit's FSA decision.In United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
Rowland's out-of-state lawyer came rolling into town promising a brawl, and crawled home looking not so much lame, but clueless. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm by David R. Papke
Fortunately, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm by Shea Denning
On Monday, October 6, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Rainey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]