Search for: "United States v. Windsor"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,003
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
In Borman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm
The starting point in that cycle was the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm
Unlike every other court ruling — federal or state — since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:00 pm
On Tuesday, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Diana Lewis, Probate Division, ruled that Florida law prohibiting same-sex marriage was unconstitutional under the United States Constitution and United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:05 pm
Rev. ___ (2014): Following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:30 am
By June of 2013, when the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Texas, in 2003, and United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
Arguing before the Supreme Court, watching United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Windsor). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 2:02 pm
Last May, Susan Foreman Jordan in our Pittsburgh office issued a very informative alert on the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:19 am
Finally, this article examines the possible effects that United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:23 pm
Judge Kelly is so far the only jurist in state or federal court since United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
After the Supreme Court’s decision last year in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:52 pm
A year after the Supreme Court decision in United States v Windsor, federal agencies have been issuing rules that affect same sex couples regarding programs like Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, Medicare, and Medicaid. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Windsor, 133 S. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on June 27, 2014, the DOL proposed the revision in light of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 3:03 am
This extension is in response to the Supreme Court ruling that federal benefits cannot be limited based on a definition of marriage as a union between one man and one woman, which was reached last year in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:26 am
So it will only be a matter of time before SCOTUS grants certeriorari in a post United States -v- Windsor case to more fully develop the constitutional civil rights jurisprudence of same-sex marriages.For now, however, it is nearly a full-time job just keeping up with the caseload; it seems every month brings a new decision and a new twist to the analysis.www.clarkstonlegal.cominfo@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:57 pm
Last June, in the decision in United States v. [read post]
