Search for: "Unpublished Disposition"
Results 381 - 400
of 453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, financing, common interest development, construction, management, eminent domain and inverse condemnation, title insurance, environmental law and land use. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
So the fact that a “new” matter might be raised on cross-examination is neither unusual nor dispositive for Rule 10 purposes. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am
Wingate, 50 M.J. 118 (C.A.A.F. 1998) (summary disposition).) [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Beyer’s unpublished manuscript entitled Controlling Body Disposition: The Law and the Macabre is cited in the following article: Meredith M. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:29 am
Firstly, any standard Will starts with the clause “I HEREBY REVOKE all former wills, codicils and other testamentary dispositions made by me. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
This post examines a recent opinion issued by a U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
In an opinion originally filed on July 31, and belatedly ordered published on August 22, 2019, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 3) affirmed a judgment granting a CEQA writ petition invalidating the final EIR and project entitlements for the Millennium Project, a controversial proposed mixed-use development on a 4.47-acre parcel straddling Vine Street and surrounding the historic Capital Records Building in Hollywood. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:53 am
The court says flatly: “the dissimilarity of the marks factor is dispositive in this case; 1-800 has not adequately alleged likelihood of consumer confusion. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
They’re unpublished works; the users are minors; there isn’t an optout; they’re using the whole thing; there’s a market harm (!). [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:46 am
Schwartz’s pathbreaking study of district courts suggests that qualified immunity is rarely dispositive in Section 1983 litigation brought for alleged Fourth Amendment violations. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
Supplemental analysis supporting the FEIR’s Master Response (including consideration of two recent unpublished scientific articles and a supplemental modeling study and sediment transport analysis) simply reinforced the DEIR’s conclusions; moreover, because the project’s incremental contribution to any cumulative impact on sediment transport/coastal erosion was found less than significant “a more comprehensive analysis of the cumulative impact of past, present and… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
After years of study, Marin County adopted an Ordinance in 2011 banning single-use plastic bags and mandating a 5-cent fee on single-use paper bags; the ordinance applies to roughly 40 retailers in the unincorporated county. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
But those arguments should still be remembered, if only as cautionary tales. [* * *] Tomorrow: How can we make sense of the line between punishable lies and unpublishable lies. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
She moved for summary disposition and the trial court granted her motion, finding that (I) the child was conceived during the marriage and (2) there was no court determination that the child was a child born or conceived during the marriage but is not the issue of that marriage. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:47 pm
Natanson is unpublished (not precedent setting), but still an important read on the topic in terms of what the court considered that will likely be considered in future cases as they start to be decided. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
The trial court denied petitioner’s mandate petition, which alleged that CEQA required an EIR for the project; petitioners appealed that judgment and the Court of Appeal affirmed and, as noted, ordered its initially-unpublished decision to be published in full a month after its filing. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
(In the unpublished part of the opinion, the Court held Petitioner had alleged sufficient facts to overcome Respondents’ statute of limitations argument for purposes of demurrer, that the case was not shown to be moot on the basis of the record before the Court, and that Petitioner had failed to show the trial court erred in denying its motion to compel production of documents pursuant to requests the trial court had found overbroad in scope.) [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
The unpublished portion of the opinion, which also won’t be further discussed here, rejected Appellants’ arguments that the project failed to meet the City Zoning Code’s open space requirements, and that the City’s “nondetriment” findings inadequately addressed alleged emergency vehicle access and related fire hazard concerns.) [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
In the next breath, however, plaintiffs set forth an unpublished statistical analysis (by Dr. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
At pages 121-123 of Innovation and Its Discontents (Jaffe and Lerner), there is text:An illustration of the difficulty of proving that an invention is obvious is the 2002 decision, In re Lee, which revolved around a technology at the very heart of the American way of life: the television remote control [read post]
