Search for: "Washington v. State of Indiana"
Results 381 - 400
of 785
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court’s recognized in concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel from Washington, D.C., an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd. of Yamaguchi, Japan sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that First Time US Generics LLC of Broomall, Pennsylvania infringed Effient® products, Patent Nos. 8,404,703 and… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
Feb. 28, 2014)), Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In the matter of American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Washington, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:07 pm
In Bond v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co., 461 F.3d 844 (7th Cir. 2006) (affirming summary judgment in disparate treatment discharge case, and noting judicial tendency to require “comparability” between plaintiffs and comparison group as a “natural response to cherry-picking by plaintiffs”); Miller v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Harvey Professor of Law and Chancellor's Professor at the Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
Harvey Professor of Law and Chancellor's Professor at the Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:06 am
Washington/Hammon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Some states qualify their safe harbors with modifying adverbs, such as "specifically," "expressly," or "affirmatively" (Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah). [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am
Review Board of Indiana. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
Also on H-Net is a review of Exit Strategies and State Building edited by Richard Caplan. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
In the case of Harris v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:14 am
As Deputy AAG, Harbour argued State Oil v. [read post]
