Search for: "Wells v. Supervisors"
Results 381 - 400
of 3,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
See SCHLEGEL II v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:35 am
The case is Hamilton v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 7:08 am
Amandah v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:27 am
In Kasten v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
” It has been well-established by Mealor v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:48 am
In Staub v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 7:33 am
Facebook posts by employees and supervisors often take center stage in employment litigation. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:50 am
On February 7, 2013 the California Supreme Court issued its much-awaited opinion in Harris v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 11:28 pm
See Anne’s case here: Karanja v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:47 am
Does partner v. partner mean it's ok? [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:08 am
However, the claim that the employer retaliated against an employee by firing her three weeks after she raised concerns about the wellness programs would go to trial (EEOC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
C.J.M. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:33 am
Dulaney v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
But one case reveals that this truism is not always, well, true. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
But one case reveals that this truism is not always, well, true. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
(Queens Health Network) v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:45 am
The Court of Appeals has reinstated a same-sex workplace harassment claim, breathing life into the Supreme Court's Oncale precedent in holding that a jury could find that a supervisor created a hostile work environment by touching the breasts of her female subordinate on three occasions over the course of a five-month period.The case is Redd v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 2:30 am
And, specifically as was the case in Murray v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 2:05 am
Hester v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:17 am
Rather, the comments that she claimed she did hear, as well as the “host” of other racist remarks in her presence, were enough at this stage of litigation. [read post]
