Search for: "Whitney v. Whitney"
Results 381 - 400
of 469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am
In fact, this guidance may very well have been issued as a result of those actions, particularly SEC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:24 am
That debate may be more mundane than the Communist rhetoric that inspired Justice Brandeis' classic opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:25 pm
Mark Whitney at TheLawNet puts his cyberfoot in his cybermouth (or his cyberhead up ... no, strike that):Over a decade ago, when we launched THELAWNET v.1, my father made a comment to my then teenage sons that I will never forget: "I saw Dad's Internet. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 5:47 am
Pratt & Whitney, 161 F.R.D. 475, 476 (S.D.Fla. 1995) (allowing questioning beyond the areas listed in a Rule 30(b)(6) notice) and Paparelli v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:39 pm
The Maverick Recording Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:09 pm
American Meat Institute v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
In KSR v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:05 am
Brandeis – his 1890 Harvard Law Review article “The Right to Privacy” and his 1927 concurrence in Whitney v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:00 am
Whitney, 181 P.2d 245 (1947). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
V. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:29 pm
Whitney E. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:55 am
Supp. 2d 98, 114 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (citing Whitney v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:39 am
The proposed budget request also includes $10.7 billion to continue development and procure 42 Lockheed F-35 fighters under a restructured program aimed at stabilizing cost and schedule, with a main engine built by Pratt & Whitney, a unit of United Technologies. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Whitney R. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:52 am
In modern parlance, "you can't fight the web," or as Justice Brandeis wrote in Whitney v California, "the remedy to be applied [to falsehood] is more speech, not enforced silence. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
Shout outs to the folks from Thomson Reuters, Dorsey & Whitney, Merrill, Kroll, Socha/Gelbmann, Jersey Girl, Laverne & Linda, et al! [read post]
