Search for: "Wright v. State of California"
Results 381 - 400
of 405
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Emerging areas in Psychology, Data, and Statistical Sciences Gary Marchant, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics, at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, moderated panelists: Xiao-Li Meng, the Whipple V. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Kansas Wright v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Because many Nader voters would have voted for Gore had Nader not been in the race, and the pickup of these Nader voters would have given Gore more states. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
Ballard, 94, of Santa Rosa, California, died January 28, 2021. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The Sebelius v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
., v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
(Many private universities face the same difficulties, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions.) [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
Wright, Kay L. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
The state lawsuit alleged that the acceptance of the funds violated the California Labor Code and the California Business and Professions Code, because some of the money collected by the Union for the job targeting program was derived from wages earned on state prevailing wage projects. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
