Search for: "v. coach inc" Results 381 - 400 of 629
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
 Jack http://t.co/xWoUgqeZi5 -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites selling pirated goods: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
 Jack http://t.co/xWoUgqeZi5 -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites selling pirated goods: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
 Jack http://t.co/xWoUgqeZi5 -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites selling pirated goods: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor could he establish a prima facie case of retaliation, ruled a federal district court in Michigan, because Walmart showed that it had accepted the employee’s request for reassignment even before he filed for FMLA leave (Allen v Walmart Stores, Inc, May 13, 2014, Fox, S). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 2:08 am
Coach/Braunsdorf Affinity, Inc. v. 12 Interactive, LLC, Cancellation No. 92051006 (March 24, 2014) [precedential].Genericness counterclaim: The Board found the genus of Petitioner's services to be volume discount buying services. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s sexual orientation discrimination claims also survived, even though she did not tell the supervisor who decided to fire her that she was “gay” or “lesbian,” because a jury could conclude that her supervisor inferred she was a lesbian based on her comments that she had an “alternative lifestyle” and did not “date men” (Benussi v UBS Financial Services, Inc, February 13, 2014, Crotty, P). [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:17 am by Lorene Park
An HR director was fired after reporting to the CFO that the company misclassified IT technicians as exempt from overtime compensation, in violation of the FLSA (Kavanagh v CDS Office Systems Inc dba CDS Office Technologies, Inc). [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
Last Monday the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Petrella v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]