Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 11,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2007, 9:18 am
The first, the approach set forth in Pereira v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:02 am
Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm
(Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:07 am
Patient Rights v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:57 pm
Goodbody* v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:25 am
Airbnb v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:36 am
" Federal Criminal Complaint: US v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
F.T.C. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:32 pm
Part V will demonstrate that contract damages are the glue for reciprocal altruism and that expectation damages are the proper measure of damages under this approach. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:29 am
In Travelers Property v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:36 am
" Federal Criminal Complaint: US v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:04 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 12:55 pm
Office of Utility Consumer Counselor v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:55 am
Abramic Leo Pharma A/S v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 7:52 am
In the Wall Street Journal, Chris Jacobs argues that this violates conditional spending holding of NFIB v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:33 am
Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3914.13 (2d ed.1992). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
’” Richardson-Merrell, 472 U.S. at431 (quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 8:53 am
Computer Acceleration Corp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:58 pm
Although it is really a competition law decision, last week's ruling of Mr Justice Morgan in Bookmakers' Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd and others v Amalgamated Racing Ltd and others [2008] EWHC 1978 (Ch), a decision from the Chancery Division, England and Wales, should be of note to IP lawyers and owners too.Right: putting the cat before the horse? [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
There are a couple of lessons to be learned from a recent decision by Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Daniel Palmieri in a quirky case called The Woods Knife Corp. v. [read post]