Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 34,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 pm
California law is designed to protect a tenant's basic, essential need for shelter. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:15 am
This post relates to a brief submitted by 19 law professors, led by Professor Coates, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 10:19 am
But, getting back on track, in See's Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:00 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:00 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:49 pm
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in its July 2021 decision Virgin America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:16 pm
The court also declined to certify a nationwide class under California law, finding this case on all fours with Mazza v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
The Court then held that California law does not permit employers to exclude sleep time from hours worked, except in limited circumstances set forth in the Wage Orders. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Other California class action cases against Microsoft were coordinated with plaintiffs’ class action, and the coordinated cases became the Microsoft I-V Cases. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 10:15 am
The opinion addresses whether the right to recover punitive damages is assignable under California law. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:42 am
In Rutherford v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:47 am
Fenton v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:55 pm
In the case of Giles v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:19 am
The Court of Appeal in Myers v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
My psychiatrist brother-in-law quipped once that in medical school they teach that 3/4s of what is wrong with a person is in their heads...The authors of DSM-V seem to have good intentions.Dr. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 7:24 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, federal law preempts would-be class claims accusing Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC of having insider trading detection and deterrent policies that are illegal under California labor and unfair competition statutes. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Medicaid Services: SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE IF CALIFORNIA CAN CUT MEDICAID PAYMENTS, Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
