Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 13,855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Courts have held that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to the individual and, or, to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" is not required because of such intra-agency communications. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:33 am
” Back in 1958, the Florida Supreme Court, in West Coast Hospital Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of argument in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:24 am
In Elmer Branch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:24 am
In Elmer Branch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:24 am
In Elmer Branch v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Moreover, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 8:18 am
The Supreme Court today is hearing oral arguments in the consolidated cases of Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:24 pm
The 6-3 decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
The ruling is notable in underscoring how the Supreme Court's sports-betting decision in Murphy v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:23 pm
Pryor appealed, seeking a court order reinstating him to his former position.The Appellate Division commenced its analysis of Pryor's appeal by noting that "[t]he review of administrative determinations in employee disciplinary cases made as a result of a hearing required by Civil Service Law Section 75 is limited to a consideration of whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence," citing Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135.Finding that the… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Considering Tan Te Lam [1996] UKPC 5, Dyson MR construed para 22 and 29 restrictively and held that: The court should construe strictly any statutory provision which purports to allow the deprivation of individual liberty by administrative detention. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
On February 13, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in Bobby Turner, et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Problem 6.1: Administrative Law Making Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
University Administrators have been communicating with Mrs. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 10:30 am
This brings us to the Illinois Appellate Court decision three weeks ago in People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
After persuading the Supreme Court to reverse a judgment against her two weeks ago in Haaland v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Wandering Dago, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:13 pm
Serreze Desrosiers v. [read post]
