Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 16,701
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:58 am
Background SeaFrance SA was a well-known operator of cross-channel ferry services that went into liquidation in November 2011. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
He considered that the levy was not imposed on imported products solely or exclusively by reason of their crossing the frontier. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:12 pm
In National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:35 am
Mazda Motor State. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
” At Forbes (and cross-posted on the Washington Legal Foundation’s blog The Legal Pulse), Richard Samp discusses another case on the January 10 Conference, Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 9:39 am
In Whitney v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:56 pm
When the world is in the midst of a public health crisis.Oh, and if the research does not stop, then Article 11 provides that, for such an infringement of Article 4, Member States must provide "penalties [that] shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive." [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
As a matter of general principle, the engagement of a right under the ECHR requires that an interference crosses a minimum threshold of seriousness (see Costello-Roberts v United Kingdom (1995) 19 EHRR 112 at [36]). [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Perry v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 8:23 am
Affirmed.Case Name: DANIEL GEORGE SWAN v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Brummel appealed and the mayor and the village cross-appealed.The Appellate Division ruled that Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the Blank Slate defendants and that branch of the motion of the Village defendants seeking to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:54 am
State). [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 11:09 am
Inst. of Tech. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
§2254, when it rejected Smith's fair cross-section claim and that it correctly analyzed this case using the comparative-disparity test. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
CHAUDHRY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
[cross-posted with the Stanford CIS Blog] [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
[cross-posted with the Stanford CIS Blog] [read post]
