Search for: "Day v. Texas" Results 3981 - 4000 of 7,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 3:21 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on Monday’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, the Texas “one person, one vote” case; he argues that the case “should be as simple as ABC for a true originalist. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
It is entirely up to their discretion according a 1994, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Celtic Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:41 am by Joy Waltemath
The plaintiffs failed to show the new rule impermissibly restricts employers’ ability to litigate threshold issues in a union election; invades employee privacy by impermissibly requiring disclosure of personal information; interferes with employers’ protected speech during union election campaigns; and that the Board acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in adopting it (Associated Builders and Contractors of Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
On June 1, 2015, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas  issued its decision in Associated Builders & Contractors of Tex., Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
’ For example, in its interpretation of article V, “A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background, or views,” the ALA grounds this right in a democracy’s requirement of an informed citizenry. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  On that same day, co-blogger Steve Boranian alerted Bexis to a new defense argument in asbestos/mesothelioma cases that also utilizes genomics – certain mutations in a gene called “BAP1” – to identify persons at greater risk of idiopathic (that is, not related to asbestos) mesothelioma. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
University of Texas. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Although the Republican governor of Texas ordered his own state guard to “monitor” the U.S. military while it is in his state (which is, of course, still one of the fifty united states that our armed forces protect), and even though the reliably unhinged Rep. [read post]