Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 3981 - 4000 of 6,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 5:55 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 23 December 2003, both parties' applications for temporary custody were denied and an injunction was issued prohibiting either party from taking the children out of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
The case was remanded for further proceedings.Read More: Appeals court rules Oklahoma license plate suit has meritUnited States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
The term "substance abuse" means the abuse of alcohol or any substance named or described in Schedules I through V of s. 893.03. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
More than a dozen such motions were brought on Monday in Boston’s federal jury trial of United States vs. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
As a Verizon customer myself (and one who has spent most of the time covered in the order outside the United States), I harbor no illusions about which of my records are now in Uncle Sam’s possession. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am by Schachtman
Cuyler Hammond, and Herbert Seidman, “Mortality Experience of Insulation Workers in the United States and Canada, 1943-1976,” 330 Ann. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:44 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia notes, ineffective assistance is a claim raised by a convicted criminal defendant that their attorney’s performance was so ineffective that it deprived them of the constitutional right guaranteed by the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm by Florian Mueller
But some people want the Federal Circuit to destroy intellectual property with a hammer only to deprive itself and all other courts in the United States of the opportunity to decide on interoperability based on what happens to an API after its creation and on what a defendant wants to do with it and to it.The EFF's submissions are, of course, consistent with Google's appellate brief, which even argued that intellectual property protection can be lost over time, mentioning Aspirin… [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am by Schachtman
Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd., [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 3 All E.R. 385 (holding that copying does not invalidate a court’s decision); id. at para. 41 (citing United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]