Search for: "Does, 1-20"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 27,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2007, 4:21 am
Alleman, at 453 n.1.Download PDF file of Alleman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:32 am
It doesn't appear to be up online yet, but if it does, I'll provide a link. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 7:31 pm
As a result, this latest dip in the ratio does NOT represent an actual decline in initial claims in 2020. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Does that mean that the Law Society is empowered to intervene in private litigation in order to advance the cause of justice? [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:14 am
Id., at *1. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:26 pm
If a person is incapable with respect to treatment, section 20(5) indicates that a parent of the incapable person may make this decision, as long as it is not prohibited by a court order or separation agreement. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 11:45 am
A BAC of .20 or greater requires 10 days up to 1 year in jail, however the court may apply the same sentencing alternatives listed above for DUI offenses. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 2:51 pm
In its May 20, 2008 policy memorandum, however, CMS announced it would only accept life expectancies obtained from CDC Table 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Under the terms of the note, the Gillespies' repayment obligations would begin on December 20, 2008, but interest on the loan amount accrued as of the date the funds were disbursed to the Gillespies. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
This is what the patent proprietor tried to do in the present case.Claim 1 as filed read:1. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:59 am
Tips: #1. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm
This cancer is linked to inhaling asbestos fibers and does not usually show up until 20-50 years after exposure to asbestos. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 7:29 am
The guidance document also provides examples of wages and states the following will be compliant: $20 per hour; $20 – 30 per hour; $40,000 per year; and $40,000 – $60,000 per year. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:39 am
Their Lordships made it clear that they ¨consider that this type of box-ticking approach does not do justice to the complexity of a decision as to whether or not to grant an interlocutory injunction. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Professor Gruber was right, we don’t know as much as he does, he is a clear expert in this field. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:14 am
Before the ATRA amendment, Internal Revenue Code Section 45(d)(1) provided that a project had to be placed in service “before January 1, 2013” in order to claim the PTC which is currently 2.2 cents per kilowatt hour sold to a third party. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:37 am
The question is quoted as follows on the CJEU website (emphasis added by author):Must Article 13(1) of Council Regulation No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 and Article 13(1) of Regulation No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 be interpreted as prohibiting solely the use by a third party of the registered name, or must they be interpreted as prohibiting the presentation of a product protected by a designation of origin, in particular the… [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
The song charted at #1 in three countries, reached top 10 in almost 20 countries, and was nominated for Best Pop Duo/Group Performance at the 57th Annual Grammy Awards. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am
The song charted at #1 in three countries, reached top 10 in almost 20 countries, and was nominated for Best Pop Duo/Group Performance at the 57th Annual Grammy Awards. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
On 21 April 2021, the EU General Court issued its ruling in Chanel, T‑44/20, ECLI:EU:T:2021:207, concerning the relative grounds for refusal established in Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of previous Regulation No 207/2009 (now Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).The action for annulment was brought by Chanel before the EU General Court against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO relating to opposition proceedings between Chanel and Huawei. [read post]
