Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 3981 - 4000 of 5,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
(2) If the Requested Party does not extradite its own national, it shall, at the request of the Requesting Party, submit the case to its competent authorities in order that proceedings may be taken if its law so provides. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
It is well settled, however, that a patentee's inclusion of a reference in an information disclosure statement does not constitute an admission that the reference is prior art. 37 C.F.R. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm by AdamSmith1776
., but now I want to discuss how it does, or doesn't, apply to the classic law firm model. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm by Bexis
  They couldn’t explain either the bioavailability of zinc (how it does or doesn't get absorbed into the body), on the front end, or how low copper supposedly causes neurologic damage, on the back end. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But does diaper odor “settle out” in this way in the real world? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
 A Patentee that refuses to waive the Statement, and does not file a Statement in response to the provisional action, would lose the right to propose an amendment, add new claims, or introduce evidence by virtue of the subsequent Final Action (governed by 37 C.F.R. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
It is submitted that it probably does not, but that the excessively vague drafting of Šilih does not allow for certainty on this point. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am by Maria Roche
As stated by Rix LJ at para 37 of DS (India): “The public interest in deportation of those who commit serious crime does well beyond depriving the offender in question from the chance to re-offend in this country; it extends to deterring and prevent serious crime generally and to upholding public abhorrence of such offending. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
§ 261, patent applications are "assignable in law by an instrument in writing," see also 37 C.F.R. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
§ 261, patent applications are "assignable in law by an instrument in writing," see also 37 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:33 am by Howard Knopf
That being said, parties are reminded that the Board does not need all existing relevant information to set fair tariffs. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Also this argument must therefore fail. [14] Accordingly and in view of the above considerations the board decides that claim 1 does not meet the requirements of A 123(2). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:23 am by azatty
  The faculty has a 37% diversity rate, and is an integral part of these two committees. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:21 pm by Daithí
 Also, this is very much an opinion piece, even more so than usual…) 1. [read post]