Search for: "IN RE M W" Results 3981 - 4000 of 4,253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2011, 11:33 am by David Lat
It’s a “single sanction” system, i.e., “one strike and you’re out. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:19 am by Steven Koprince
 Judge Bruggink began his analysis this way: “[w]hat the agency did here constitutes an egregious example of intransigence and deception, not just with regard to the bidder, but to the GAO and to the court. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The 14th Court of Appeals rejected all challenges against the arbitration award, the arbitration process, and the arbitrator, and affirmed the family court's order confirming the decision of the arbitrator - a former judge.M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O NIn this suit affecting the parent-child relationship, appellant, Lynn G., appeals from the trial court's order affirming a post-divorce arbitration award. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
To be clear, I'm not telling you to swipe a N95 mask from a health care worker. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This figure is significantly lower than in 2016, when the Delaware Court of Chancery effectively put an end to the practice of disclosure-only settlements in In re Trulia Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:24 am by Matthias Weller
– A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:36 am by Matthias Weller
– A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
No Re-Verifying Current Employees  Refrain from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by the employment eligibility verification provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 USC § 1324a(b), or that would violate any E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding the employer has entered into with the Department of Homeland Security. * * * To be sure, AB 450 offers sops feigning fealty to federal… [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
No Re-Verifying Current Employees  Refrain from re-verifying the employment eligibility of a current employee at a time or in a manner not required by the employment eligibility verification provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 USC § 1324a(b), or that would violate any E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding the employer has entered into with the Department of Homeland Security. * * * To be sure, AB 450 offers sops feigning fealty to federal… [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am by Paul Maharg
Other regulatory reports in England & Wales in this period (Ormrod, Benson, Marr, Wood) barely acknowledged the idea of legal edtech, let alone explored it.1 The Legal Education & Training Review (LETR) was the first report to comment extensively on legal edtech in E+W. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:53 pm by Lovechilde
“And if you’re saying that I can be bought for $5,000, I’m offended. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm by Dan Rodriguez
Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963) and In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978), as turning on the associational interests of the lawyers qua lawyers. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
F & M Equipment, Ltd., f/k/a Furnival Machinery Company, __ F.3d __ (3rd Cir. [read post]