Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 9:44 am
These orders are designed to protect minor children during the legal process. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Pushing by famous mark owners to get property protection; statute is a compromise/limitation on property rights, and judges have reacted to it that way, being not very friendly to dilution in most cases. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
It is important to highlight that the majority of the studies showing an association between talc and ovarian cancer came from case-control studies by design (as opposed to a cohort design). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:29 am
See In re: Google Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
Judge in Teflon was surprised how well respondents did distinguishing brand & common names.Frito-Lay’s survey: 41% said it was a brand, 41% common, 18% not sure. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
“That’s where we’re at,” she says. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
The sentence (assuming we’re sticking to the presumptive range) will be either 5–15 months or 6–17 months. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
You’re welcome. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:57 am
The chemicals in question were synthetic cannabinoids, substituted cathinones, and miscellaneous designer psychedelics. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:27 am
Code and copyright rarely meet, but in the vein of the above, can code be construed as a copyright protected work, and if so, how much can you copy before you're infringing the rights attached to the code? [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
The judge can then make a order. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Garan, Inc., 224 USPQ 1064 (TTAB 1984) (holding applicant’s marks featuring a design of a mountain lion, for clothing items, and opposer’s marks, a puma design and PUMA (with and without puma design), for items of clothing and sporting goods, likely to cause confusion); In re Duofold Inc., 184 USPQ 638 (TTAB 1974) (holding mark consisting of a design of an eagle lined for the color gold, for sports apparel, and mark consisting of GOLDEN EAGLE… [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Maybe it was a two-day trial, three if you had a slow judge. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:38 pm
In these circumstances there are many in A’s position who find that they are re-living the abusive situation; and this is precisely what the court hearing is designed to get her away from. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
Not if they’re funding cases like this. 2. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
” Lebowitz answers no, not by design. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:57 am
Judge Jose Martinez, a federal judge from Florida who was sitting by designation, stuck to the case law saying said that sexual orientation is not “sex discrimination” prohibited by Title VII. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Judge Derrick K. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
(In re Pilgrim’s Pride Corp, February 15, 2017, Mullin, M.) [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
The judge-made doctrine prohibits a patent’s seller/assignor (such as an inventor who assigned rights to his employer) from later challenging the validity of a patent in patent infringement litigation. [read post]
