Search for: "Lowe v. State"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 9,573
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court have recently focused their attention on issues like abortion, guns, and religion, administrative law scholars concentrated this past term on two low visibility cases—American Hospital Association v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case is McDowell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
FEC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts Last week, California-based burger chain In-N-Out sued Denver-based Smashburger, alleging infringement and dilution of trademarks including DOUBLE-DOUBLE and TRIPLE TRIPLE (for, among other things, “hamburger sandwiches and cheeseburger sandwiches”). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Here's Justice Gorsuch giving voice to that view earlier this year in his concurrence in West Virginia v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Reasonable suspicion is a low threshold; in this jurisdiction it is the threshold which justifies arrest. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
There was organic, low-fat, thick, thin, healthy and indulgent. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:34 pm
Otherwise, an offender could avoid sex offender registration requirements simply by moving his or her state of residence, thereby frustrating the purpose behind sex offender registration laws as in People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 1:06 pm
Winn-Dixie Stores and Robles v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
” (Campagnolla v Mulholland, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990].) [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 12:00 am
The expired RTF regulations, the landmark realty transfer fee case of Mack-Cali Realty, LP, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:00 am
In Warren v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The Court’s ruling yesterday in McGirt v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
