Search for: "Rolling v. State" Results 3981 - 4000 of 4,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2018, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Rather than use these responses, the filmmakers spliced in b-roll footage taken prior to the interview in which Couric asked the VCDL interviewees to sit in silence while technicians calibrated the recording equipment. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm by Robert Liles
  This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by admin
Public sector employees are entitled to relief similar to the relief offered under the Congressional Accountability Act, Title V of the United States Code, and the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
For Green's lawyer, the decision from the 3rd Circuit in Green v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
The problem is that the state of Texas also doesn't know.Well, yeah. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
The problem is that the state of Texas also doesn't know.Well, yeah. [read blog]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
Incredulous, Weinstein looked at me, rolled his eyes, paused dramatically, and then waved his hand at me to continue. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
  What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced two final rules for the oil and gas industry that roll back Obama-era methane emissions standards and eliminate federal requirements that oil and gas companies install technology to detect and fix methane leaks. [read post]