Search for: "State of Miss. v. United States"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 4,458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2022, 6:32 am
By Gretchen Sisson When a draft of the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 7:07 pm
United Tech. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 3:08 pm
But last week in Brayman v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:31 pm
Have legislators missed a trick when they did not legislate for what happens to our data after death? [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:06 am
To obtain digital evidence held within the United States, parties to legal proceedings abroad have the option of using a federal statute known as Section 1782 (28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:13 am
”Burke v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Each time the bullet missed killing him by a fraction of an inch. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 11:54 am
The rental unit must have things like functioning smoke detectors, but the landlord does not have to provide fire extinguishers (unless it is stated under the lease contract). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am
On 11 November 2015, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the appeals of Bates v Weston; and Leeds United Football v Weston [2015] EWHC 3070 (QB). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 11:54 am
The rental unit must have things like functioning smoke detectors, but the landlord does not have to provide fire extinguishers (unless it is stated under the lease contract). [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
This is how he interprets the case law of the ECtHR at [109]: “It is true that in S v United Kingdom the court does not expressly refer to the reasonable expectation of privacy but its analysis seems to me to be consistent with it. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
But in their emphasis on the problems in toxicological evidence, the judges missed problems of internal validity, such as confounding, in epidemiologic studies: “Why do courts have such a preference for human epidemiological studies over animal experiments? [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:11 am
See e.g., Chaset v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:11 am
See e.g., Chaset v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
