Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 3981 - 4000
of 51,477
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
Nebraska and Department of Education v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
United States and Palomares v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
A number of states allow text advertising so long as other rules are followed. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Lenard v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:39 pm
United States (2002). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
The New York State 2022-2023 Budget[1] amendment QQ updated the State’s approach to freshwater wetlands regulation. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm
GoogleOn Tuesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:12 pm
Proposed settlement in Bowen In Bowen v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:36 am
"As a final development in our case, Wikimedia Foundation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:17 am
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
(For more on this, see Chambers v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
As per the guidance in R v Secretary of State, chambers should identify one named clerk responsible for communicating the draft judgment from the court to the relevant barristers. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:57 am
Va. 2021), and at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Thaler v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:46 am
Missouri et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:23 am
The officer stated that honesty would “go a long way” and asked a third time, at which point the defendant admitted ownership of the gun. [read post]