Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 133,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 1:16 pm
Reese v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:11 am
" United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
: Massachusetts V. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
United States, which the Court has not yet decided it will hear, provides the Court with an opportunity to revisit its holding in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 11:02 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
”In Matter of D'Agostino v DiNapoli, 24 Misc 3d 1090, one of the relatively few State court decisions that consider the extent of the protections provided by Article V, §7 of New York State Constitution's, the court said that Article V, §7 “merely provides that retirement system benefits are contractual in nature and may not be impaired or diminished by state action. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:16 pm
Virginia to affirm a communicating a threat conviction in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
Castro v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Well, um, in Miles v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:43 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Joaquin v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:51 pm
On May 5, 2015, in Kelly v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:57 am
iStock_000003589389Medium.jpg Sixth Circuit concludes that once the defense raised an "inference of misidentification," the government could rebut the inference, in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
The court may release its ruling on that case, Windsor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
In a case that may make quite a big deal. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:47 am
In a concurring opinion in Bush v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
(This, and the previous scenario, may be logically impossible; “not a watershed rule” and “not explicitly made retroactive” may be mutually exclusive. [read post]
