Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 3981 - 4000 of 6,478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm by Nancy Morawetz
Gonzales (8-1 decision rejecting broad application of the drug-aggravated-felony category to any state drug felony); Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am by Stephen E. Sachs
All these sources, in Judge Fletcher's excellent formulation, were laws for the United States, if not of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Anderson
Kennedy stated that he reveres Marshall as “one of the greatest jurists not only in the history of the United States, but in the history of the world. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:10 am by Kevin Russell
Monday the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Carmichael v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm by Joseph Fishkin
In an end-of-the-term flurry that was not lacking in forceful dissents, Chief Justice Roberts’ dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
The majority applied the Court’s recent New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:48 pm
(ZDNet - A Developer's View) CLIPARAMA.com launches world's biggest video only search (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) Details released on the Radiohead experiment results: a tremendous success (Techdirt) Disney EULA funny, but also a bit sad (Innovationpartners)   Canada Canada Election 2008 - a digital policy scorecard (Michael Geist)   Europe European Court of Justice rules database owners can prevent material from being transferred from their… [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm by Guest Blogger
It does not aim at marriage, but, rather, at preventing early parenthood and investing in young people’s education and human capital.Sawhill proposes to “change the default” to reduce the staggeringly high percentage of unplanned and unwanted births in the United States. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Racial distinctions cannot exist in the machinery that selects the officers and lawmakers of the United States; and all citizens of this State and Country are entitled to cast a free and untrammeled ballot in our elections, and if the only material and realistic elections are clothed with the name “primary”, they are equally entitled to vote there. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:10 am
Turning to comity, Kane described that doctrine as "an expression of one state's voluntary choice to defer to another state's policy. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
United States Filmmakers have obtained a subpoena to reveal the identities of Redditors who commented on piracy-related topics. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]