Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 4001 - 4020 of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 6:07 am by Evan George
Then a coalition of states and environmental groups challenged the denial, and the result was the landmark decision Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Steve Hall
When I was the lone American lawyer advising the Appeals Chamber of the U.N. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
It is not uncommon for the state apparatus itself to be impeached by the people as a core political act; but the state protects its own apparatus through an ideology of law that vests the legitimate power to impeach (like political power) only in itself. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ RightsNoudehouenou v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
The following is a Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide for the State of Michigan. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm by Charon QC
In Bowman v Secular Society Limited [1917] AC 406 at 457, Lord Sumner refers to the older Taylor’s case of 1676 1 Vent, as follows: ‘…and Hale said that such kind of wicked blasphemous words were not only an offence to God and religion, but a crime against the Laws, State, and Government, and therefore punishable in this Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Deadlock Between LLC’s Co-Managers Requires Hearing in Dissolution Proceeding Advanced 23, LLC v Chamber House Partners, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32662(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 15, 2017]. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:12 am by emagraken
In yesterday’s case (Przybysz v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am by Susan Hennessey
Upcoming Proceedings and Developments in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:19 am by Ruth Levush
Interestingly, the execution of the Conseil d’État judgment, which authorized the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration to a patient in a tetraplegic state, was the subject of a recent hearing at the European Court of Human Rights’ Grand Chamber on January 7, 2015 (see Lambert and Others v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Events On 29 November 2022, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is hosting a virtual talk on “Contemporary First Amendment Politics” at the California State University. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:43 pm
Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, and on appeal to the Supreme Court). [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm by Kevin Kaufman
We partnered with the Kansas Chamber of Commerce on this book, although Tax Foundation maintains full editorial independence on its recommendations. [read post]