Search for: "D. O. B."
Results 4001 - 4020
of 7,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 11:49 am
Richard Lowther’s Application: Opposition by Formula One Licensing BV (Case O/396/14) was decided last month by Hearing Officer Chris Bowen in the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
’ . . .Two other jurors agreed with Juror D, one based on `his own experience in managing. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:22 pm
This appeal arose from a challenge by O’Shea’s–Baxter, LLC, d/b/a Flanagan’s Ale House (“Flanagan’s”) to an order of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (“ABC Board”) upholding the Louisville/Jefferson County Government’s (“Louisville Metro”) denial of Flanagan’s application for a retail drink license. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:22 pm
This appeal arose from a challenge by O’Shea’s–Baxter, LLC, d/b/a Flanagan’s Ale House (“Flanagan’s”) to an order of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (“ABC Board”) upholding the Louisville/Jefferson County Government’s (“Louisville Metro”) denial of Flanagan’s application for a retail drink license. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 8:40 am
Les requérants devraient pouvoir bénéficier de la déclaration d’inconstitutionnalité ultérieure au jugement d’instance et rendue avant l’audition de l’appel. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:23 am
The homeowners subsequently sued Simon d/b/a Sherlock Pest and d/b/a Sherlock Spec for allegedly performing an improper wood destroying insect inspection. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:50 am
El Tribunal de Instancia determinó que el peso de la prueba para que el Estado pueda declarar nulo un acuerdo contributivo es uno de prueba robusta y convincente y se debe probar la intención de cometer fraude o engaño. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:59 am
" But these are fraud claims, and that means that plaintiff must satisfy FRCP 9(b)’s particularity pleading requirements. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(b) Necessary household goods, furnishings, electronics, wearing apparel, other personal effects and yard equipment, not to exceed $12,000 in value, belonging to the judgment debtor or a dependent of the judgment debtor, to be selected by the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(b) Necessary household goods, furnishings, electronics, wearing apparel, other personal effects and yard equipment, not to exceed $12,000 in value, belonging to the judgment debtor or a dependent of the judgment debtor, to be selected by the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 12:26 pm
“La designación como tesoro del Antiguo Acueducto del río Piedras significa que tenemos un gran aliado en la búsqueda de una solución a la amenaza que impone el plan de canalización del río Piedras. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:03 pm
At the New York Times, David D. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 4:10 pm
O'Brien(2nd Dept., decided 9/19/2014)State Farm's policy defined "Temporary Substitute Car" as "a car that is in the lawful possession of the person operating it and that: 1. replaces your car for a short time while your car is out of use due to its: a. breakdown; b. servicing; c. repair; d. loss; or e. destruction; and 2. neither you nor the person operating it own or have registered. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
The Court of Appeals did not fuss over the general statement of Maryland law of apportionment of damages, which has adopted the American Law Institute’s Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433A (1965), which provides: “(1) Damages for harm are to be apportioned among two or more causes where (a) there are distinct harms, or (b) there is a reasonable basis for determining the contribution of each cause to a single… [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Slightly contrary to the reaction of plaintiff Victor Restis’s lead attorney, Abbe D. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
D., B. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:25 pm
Exhibit B: see above. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:48 am
Rule 37(b)(2)(D). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:44 am
Temos leis excelentes e outras nem tanto, mas nosso déficit não é legal ou normativo. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:44 am
Temos leis excelentes e outras nem tanto, mas nosso déficit não é legal ou normativo. [read post]
