Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 7,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
This does not seem to be the right thing. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:09 am
I say, when asked "And how does Mrs Secord qualify as 'women in the military'?" [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
This book is not meant to be the definitive guide to the legislative history of the NDAAs (though Lawfare covered virtually all of it), nor does it capture every single debate commentators had about the laws. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:21 pm
VA does not have a great track record in drafting timely regulations. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
Again, that the claims here are in category X or Y don't matter. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:47 pm
Not so long ago, I had the experience of having a lawyer put a chart together during his crossexamination of an expert witness. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
Since Google Patents does not allow one to export information, I use Petapator, a Chrome extension, to capture the data for later use. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
Since Google Patents does not allow one to export information, I use Petapator, a Chrome extension, to capture the data for later use. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:11 am
App’x 887, 891 (11th Cir. 2012). [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm
Patent No. 8,177,449) · Count X for Declaratory Judgment (Infringement of U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Of course, this case does not mention Louboutin, because that would be awkward.) [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 11:03 pm
App’x 65, 105, U.S.P.Q.2d 1960 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
Eight days out of 365 x 3 = 1,095 days (1,096 if one year is a leap year), or less than 1% of the time (to be exact, 0.73%). [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:47 am
Why, I was asked yesterday, does this type of information really need to be kept secret? [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
A friend of mine who was a lawyer, after practicing 20 years, got a call from a member of a union one day that had asbestos workers, and he was told to get a chest x ray. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
”) Below, I have updated once again the case law on the issue of using relative and attributable risks to satisfy plaintiff’s burden of showing, more likely than not, that an exposure or condition caused a plaintiff’s disease or injury. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:28 pm
Thus, years of billing does not guarantee that the government will not take action. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
I haven't always been that kind to Justice Scalia (or to Justice Scalia's hats), but I do think he's a very good writer, and so I'm glad to be able to quote him saying something I agree with. [read post]
