Search for: "FELTS v. STATE" Results 4001 - 4020 of 5,861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It should be remebered that only Justice Thomas resorted to originalism in SFFA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:19 am by Gene Killian
” I thought of that definition when I read the recent decision in in CV Ice Company v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm by April Glaser
We had the opportunity to talk about how the Free Software Foundation is one of the 22 plaintiffs in our First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles  v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm
” The ruling is an important development in the law governing the separation of church and state. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm by Hadley Baker, Claudia Swain
Although he did not mention the talks specifically, Cherif Mahamat Zene stated in a letter that he felt himself “at odds with parallel actions and initiatives” with unnamed senior officials. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:51 am by Larry
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:11 am by John Jascob
According to the respondents, the certiorari petition contended that the appellate court exceeded Congress’s authorizing statute by extending a private right of action for proxy solicitation shareholders onto tender offer shareholders (Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Penal Courts have also convicted to jail sentences those accused for state corruption. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 am by Michael C. Dorf
What about what Justice Thomas wrote for the Court in this year's Second Amendment case, NYS Rifle & Pistol v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:43 am by Florian Mueller
HTC resorts to failure-of-proof and failure-to-state-actionable-claim types of arguments, which are irrelevant for now because the leading German reference on patent litigation clearly says that all a plaintiff needs to do here to state an actionable claim is to allege that a specified patent claim is infringed by certain accused products. [read post]