Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 4001 - 4020
of 5,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2018, 3:40 pm
Four years ago, the Animal Legal Defense Fund sued the California State Exposition and Fairs (Cal Expo) and the University of California Board of Regents for mistreating pregnant and nursing pigs at the California State Fair. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:10 am
Cal. 2008) for the proposition that the doctrine of intervening rights applies to re-issued patents and does not extend to certificates of correction. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
B211968, 2010 WL 196559 (Cal. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 11:07 am
Starting January 1, 2024, four of those employment notices have mandatory updates — so make sure you’re prepared for 2024 by pre-ordering your CalChamber 2024 California and Federal Labor Law Posters plus any California Wage Orders specific to your industry as new postings are required January 1. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
Rev. 1 (2009), Achieving Impartiality in State Courts, 97 Cal. [read post]
28 May 2008, 3:16 am
Again, if you're like me, the natural tendency is to forego the instruction manual, to fire up the tool, and to jump right into the project. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:50 am
Finally, upon dismissal of the Dyck-O’Neal case, the statute of limitations has likely run preventing it being re-filed. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 9:34 am
In yesterday’s In re Valerie W., case no. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
Waters Introduces Investment Adviser Examination Improvement Act Representative Maxine Waters (D-Cal.), along with Representative John Delaney (D-MD), again introduced legislation that would allow the SEC to charge user fees to fund examinations of investment advisers, the Investment Adviser Examination Improvement Act of 2013. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:01 pm
So if your hospital bill was $4000 but Medicare paid $900, then you're stuck asking for the $900. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
Rptr.2d 589, 591 (Cal. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:33 am
(Cal. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Lopez (Cal. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Cal. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
Cal. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Cal. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 4:43 pm
Continuous Active Learning® (CAL®) was reported as the most used predictive coding protocol with 84.62% of responders using it in their predictive coding efforts. 55.38% of responders reported using only one predictive coding protocol in their predictive coding efforts. 43.08% of responders reported using more than one predictive coding protocol in their predictive coding efforts. 1.54% of responders reported not using any predictive coding protocol. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
Continuous Active Learning® (CAL®) was reported as the most used predictive coding protocol with 83.33% of responders using it in their predictive coding efforts. 54.76% of responders reported using only one predictive coding protocol in their predictive coding efforts. 40.47% of responders reported using more than one predictive coding protocol in their predictive coding efforts. 4.76% of responders reported not using any specific predictive coding protocol. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:52 pm
Continuous Active Learning® (CAL®) was reported as the most used predictive coding protocol with 90.48% of responders using it in their predictive coding efforts. 57.14% of responders reported using only one predictive coding protocol in their predictive coding efforts. 41.27% of responders reported using more than one predictive coding protocol in their predictive coding efforts. 1.59% of responders reported not using any predictive coding protocol. [read post]
